<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Give A Crit &#8211; Sketch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnwaynehill.com/blog/2010/11/06/give-a-crit-sketch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnwaynehill.com/blog/2010/11/06/give-a-crit-sketch/</link>
	<description>I design compelling experiences and create stunning photography.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 23:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.johnwaynehill.com/blog/2010/11/06/give-a-crit-sketch/comment-page-1/#comment-665</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnwaynehill.com/blog/?p=295#comment-665</guid>
		<description>Lynn, great question and suggestions.

Others will be able to see the critique and comment on it providing a conversation and dialogue between the photographer (who can participate) and the viewers.

An emphasis on the rationale would likely be useful. I&#039;m hoping that by providing some ambiguity, as well as designing these critiques to be &#039;serious&#039; that criticizers will indeed rationalize their critique within the commentary section. Whether or not this works well has yet to be determined.

Thanks for the comments!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lynn, great question and suggestions.</p>
<p>Others will be able to see the critique and comment on it providing a conversation and dialogue between the photographer (who can participate) and the viewers.</p>
<p>An emphasis on the rationale would likely be useful. I&#8217;m hoping that by providing some ambiguity, as well as designing these critiques to be &#8216;serious&#8217; that criticizers will indeed rationalize their critique within the commentary section. Whether or not this works well has yet to be determined.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comments!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynn</title>
		<link>http://www.johnwaynehill.com/blog/2010/11/06/give-a-crit-sketch/comment-page-1/#comment-663</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 05:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnwaynehill.com/blog/?p=295#comment-663</guid>
		<description>Questions: Will others be able to see the critics? Or just the photographer? 

Suggestion: 
To me it seems like you are asking for the photographers to give a laundry list of good and bad, and then follow it up with &quot;commentary&quot;. 

Perhaps an emphasis on the rationale of the critique might be useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Questions: Will others be able to see the critics? Or just the photographer? </p>
<p>Suggestion:<br />
To me it seems like you are asking for the photographers to give a laundry list of good and bad, and then follow it up with &#8220;commentary&#8221;. </p>
<p>Perhaps an emphasis on the rationale of the critique might be useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

